Using artificial intelligence (AI) in spirituality makes us wonder if it’s really a good idea to give it a god-like role.

Raihan Khan, a young student with an innovative spirit, initiated a real revolution by launching QuranGPT. His ambition was to exploit artificial intelligence to provide answers to spiritual questions based on the Koran.

When he revealed his project, he was greeted with mixed feelings, fluctuating between admiration and criticism. Despite this, Khan remained steadfast. Convinced of the potential of his AI project, he considered it a revolutionary way to connect individuals to their spirituality.

He underlines : “Many aspire to be closer to their religion, but find they do not have enough time to fully devote themselves to it. What if a simple command could facilitate access to this knowledge? »

Through this vision, QuranGPT has become a valuable tool for nearly 230,000 people. It offers a new way of experiencing their spirituality in the digital age.

The appearance of chatbots like Bible.Ai, Gita GPTand others, raises the question of the authenticity of spiritual experience in the digital age. These tools, trained on sacred texts, offer instant spiritual insights. Their ability to synthesize complex ideas in seconds is revolutionary.

However, this progress is not without sparking debate. Theologians, such as Ilia Delio, express their concern. They see these innovations as shortcuts to God. This, they argue, could weaken deep, personal commitment to religious teachings.

Language models like LLMs are also used to examine how the Bible is translated differently. Earlier this year, researchers from around the world shared a study on arXiv.com where they used sentiment analysis.

This technique, based on natural language processing, is used to identify emotions in a text. They applied it to Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, a famous New Testament text “Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth…”.

By analyzing 5 versions, including that of the King James, they noticed significant differences in word choice. They also noted variations in humor, optimism and empathy in the texts. This reveals the various ways in which Jesus communicated his messages.

Beneficial or blasphemous technology?

The adoption of AI in the religious domain is not unequivocal. It has undeniable advantages, such as accelerating the translation of sacred texts. Paratext and the Greek Room illustrate how AI can democratize access to Scripturetranscending language barriers.

On the other hand, this integration provokes an important reflection: can we seriously assign to an AI the task of exploring the nuances and richness of religious texts? Technology promises to provide divine wisdom on demand. But does it risk distancing us from the essence of the spiritual quest based on reflection, meditation and doubt?

    Share the article:


Our blog is powered by readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *